That's a completely unrealistic request as I'm sure you know, but the fact that even one bike has developed the problem with only moderate on road use should be enough, together with the scale and expense of BMW's response, to convince anybody that there is an issue with the design and/or construction of this part.
BMW obviously fear that many more bikes will eventually suffer this problem without the program of remedial action they have now launched. If they believed that only a few bikes exposed to extreme off-road incidents have or will develop the problem, then I would not have expected the scale of the response, albeit it seems to have taken BMW a long time to come to this conclusion. Possibly it has taken them some time to negotiate a cost contribution from the fork suppliers.
Without some numbers and evidence, it's all speculation and hearsay - simples.
'The scale of the response' is caution - check all bikes and fix as appropriate, it really is that simple.
