The twin-cam is a great bike (I had one) but it is a bit soft compared to the LC.
Soft is sometimes not a bad thing.
The twin-cam is a great bike (I had one) but it is a bit soft compared to the LC.
The reality is this - a few people have problems (fair enough) but the vast majority do not and the new GS LC is the best selling GS ever - make what you will of the facts.
The twin-cam is a great bike (I had one) but it is a bit soft compared to the LC.
KTM : airbox. Do some reading on this. It needs work from Day 1.
Absolutely no difference in performance in the real world.
On a track with two riders of similar ability I would imagine the wc would pull away from a twin cam,but as I said, in the real world the wc is not going to get from A to B any quicker than a twin cam.
Steve
The TC is a good bike but the LC engine is the next step on.
I have to admit that the LC ticks all my requirements apart from corrosion...
the TC feels a pleasure to ride and does not have a SHIT GEARBOX.

Like others have mentioned Ive just had a new Engine fitted to my GS due to corrosion,which was to be fair,quite minor (5565 miles).
When speaking to the Dealer about the above I also told them the Gearbox problem,engaging first,then bad clunking up to 2nd and down to 2nd from third,this was all noted.
Believing all would be well when I collected the bike I rode off into the sunset accompanied by the same clunking as before
On speaking to the Dealer I was informed that the Engine was replaced 'like for like ' in other words,light flywheel not the new heavy one (which I believed from posts on here might cure the problem !)
So,really,apart from the paintwork being nice and shiny on me new engine,I have the same bike as before (with zero miles on it of course)
I decided to go to another dealer and try out a GSA to see if their was any difference.
Having been out for an hour I found hardly any difference at all but on returning to Dealer I thought I'd chance my luck by asking about a P/X.
Feckin wish I hadn't
What I thought was going to be a small amount (ish) of adjustment nearly knocked me off me chair !!!
I was also informed that despite my new engine having covered only 200 miles at this point,it was the over 5000 miles on the clock that counted because of wear n tear to the other parts of the Bike !
I was also told that any prospective buyer would want to know why it had a new engine,I thought the answer to that would be simple but obviously not,so not only am I the owner of a new engine clunky gearbox beautiful 2014 GS,I am stuck with something no one else will want unless I feckin give it away !!!!!
How many owners with clunky gearboxes blip the throttle on down changes?
How many owners with clunky gearboxes blip the throttle on down changes?
It's such a shame you've had issues with yours, as there are thousands of bikes without gearbox problems. The gearbox on my GSA is super smooth, and much nicer than on any of my Twin Cams.![]()

How many owners with clunky gearboxes blip the throttle on down changes?
i dont for one minute think other manufacturers would have looked after their customers like me with BMW suppling new bikes,![]()
It's such a shame you've had issues with yours, as there are thousands of bikes without gearbox problems. The gearbox on my GSA is super smooth, and much nicer than on any of my Twin Cams.![]()