You spout bollocks.
I said in my original post that IF the registration number of a rejected bike was added to a sticky list then someone might see it and could take any action he might deem necessary IF he happened to come across the bike up for sale. The last owner has not got to worry about anything.
I can't see what the problem is, if BMW are going to repair it to a good standard, what have they got to hide ?
There are people, like yourself presumably, who would not give a stuff about it and happily hand over the cash.
Then there are people like me who would rather avoid a bike like this.
This is akin to a repaired vehicle, cat D, being sold without you knowing. It may have just sustained minor damage and been repaired to a high standard but you would want to know. In fact the register of these vehicles exists by law to enable purchasers to make a decision knowing its history.
Simple is it not ?
I said in my original post that IF the registration number of a rejected bike was added to a sticky list then someone might see it and could take any action he might deem necessary IF he happened to come across the bike up for sale. The last owner has not got to worry about anything.
I can't see what the problem is, if BMW are going to repair it to a good standard, what have they got to hide ?
There are people, like yourself presumably, who would not give a stuff about it and happily hand over the cash.
Then there are people like me who would rather avoid a bike like this.
This is akin to a repaired vehicle, cat D, being sold without you knowing. It may have just sustained minor damage and been repaired to a high standard but you would want to know. In fact the register of these vehicles exists by law to enable purchasers to make a decision knowing its history.
Simple is it not ?


