You've experienced frame flex on a 1200? Really? Honestly? It's the one thing it doesn't suffer from. The limit on the boxes has absolutely nothing to do with frame flex but aerodynamic stability? The fuel range is not short. Most people find an 18 litre tank/220 miles range good enough. Few people ride longer without a break. I've had closer to 240 miles from mine ridden sensibly and smoothly.I have not ridden the 1300 GS yet but it sounds like BMW addressed One main issue the 11 year old 1200/1250 platform had while creating new ones…Ridden fast on the street the frame flexes at high speed (therefore the 112mph warning on the boxes) as also turning in fast where you can feel part of your energy was lost somewhere in the frame as it flexes….If the new bike is stiff as also the suspension that is good ! Maybe no need to spend 4 grand on Tractive shocks…But the tank destroys the whole thing because the short fuel range is a nuisance at least…Like I said before all the cheating on paper besides (tank,center stand,luggage rack,lithium battery) a 24 L tank would have been perfect ! The motor seems stronger but keeping the 76 mm stroke/1350cc and raising the power level by 1000 rpm especially with the shorter stroke now would have made it even better but BMW does it like apple and we get only small increments every few year$$$…The radar box in the front needs to go and a real taillight added And the exhaust needs to be Louder than the mechanical clatter of the valvetrain…And hopefully the new aluminum boxes wont be smaller like the varios are…Still lot of room for improvement I would say ! Wished they would have pulled out all the stops right from the getgo to create some real excitement but I remember when in 2012 the all new 1200-LC came out and I kept my camhead for a few more seasons until I bought one and was disappointed by the lame engine until the 1250 took care of that problem…LOL
Can you please at least try to post something useful or factual instead of this constant drip drip feed of nonsense and fantasy? The 1200 engine is anything but lame, especially when compared to earlier air/oil heads. Only the ignorant might suggest that 92ft-lbs of shove is inadequate for real world riding. Want a track day bike? Buy one and enjoy it. The 1200L/C was the first real hike in power and punch for years and I ought to know as I've owned a fair few earlier pre L/C bikes and the difference seemed greater to me than the 1200 to 1250 jump. Yes, I could use the "ignore" button but it'd be refreshing to see you post something of value, something that positively contributes instead of the constant flogging of dead horses. Go ride a 1300 before posting anything else on its perceived performance shortcomings perhaps? I'm sure the feedback would be of interest.
