1. I hope so.
2. Who cares?
3. See answer #2
PS. I'm sure Geoff could tell you if you asked him.
2. Who cares?
3. See answer #2
PS. I'm sure Geoff could tell you if you asked him.
It is interestingThis could start to get too complex to explain, but you are correct, in our products we typically have two copies of our code so there is a backup in case of a fail during a field upgrade - checksums are checked and if the new code is corrupted it reverts to the backup, there are many ways things can be done. All I want to know is the answer to a few questions and for them to be made public so that we can all understand both the upsides and downsides to having a re-map.
These are just three such questions.
What happens if BMW do a critical fuelling (perhaps safety) update? Will this critical update be ignored?
What is the effect upon emissions after a re-map?
After a re-map are any of the sensors, switches etc ignored?
Personally I'd like to see an independent before and after dyno test as the "before" figures are much lower than anyone else seems to measure at the rear wheel![]()
These are just three such questions.
What happens if BMW do a critical fueling (perhaps safety) update? Will this critical update be ignored?
What is the effect upon emissions after a re-map?
After a re-map are any of the sensors, switches etc ignored?
No you are wrongIt's not your scepticism, it's the way you go on every hilltop thread asking the same questions, when you have been given opportunities to talk to Geoff in person, or on the phone, to find out exactly how it works but have chosen not to. I have no doubts that it works, and have first hand experience, so can confirm that it's a very worthwhile modification.
It's almost as if you seem to get a buzz out of stirring the shit, and trying to put potential customers off. It's called trolling.
I think these are all fair questions mate. I personally would not have a re-map until I was happy with answers to them. Before I'm hung, drawn and quartered for that statement let me add that it does not mean those that have had a remap have done anything wrong. Horses for courses and all that good stuff.
Only one of those I can offer an educated opinion to is No2. Emissions will definitely go up. I use to work in the insurance industry and one of my customers owned a small company in Kent that did R&D work for Jag Landrover on their ECU's and other systems like ABS, Stability Control etc etc. I did his business and professional indemnities insurance for him and as you can imagine the limits were pretty big numbers so we spent a lot of time trying to understand what he did and the risks we were covering. He told us that since the 2006 emission based tax system came in engines were tuned primarily for emissions. He said removing that restriction from engine development would allow an immediate increase of 20-25% in power output. He also said it was having a negative impact on fuel economy.
Negative impact on emissions makes little difference at the moment but might in the future if rules around MOT's and or TAX change?!?!
. My background is in software engineering so I was intrigued to understand the process at Hilltop so I did what is advised above...I talked to Geoff and satisfied myself that what he was doing made sense (so don't take my word for it). I'm now on my third Hilltoped bike...each has become smoother and more economical. I'm not interested in power.
This isn't addressed particularly to anyone but if you just hate the idea of tinkering with manufacturer's kit/ are nervous about insurance implications/ are nervous about voiding warranty, then just don't do it. If you're relaxed about all that but still sceptical about the claims, just have a chat with Geoff and he'll be as open about what he does as he realistically can be. ".
No you are wrong
There are plenty of posts from you that prove that I am correct.
I think these are all fair questions mate. I personally would not have a re-map until I was happy with answers to them. Before I'm hung, drawn and quartered for that statement let me add that it does not mean those that have had a remap have done anything wrong. Horses for courses and all that good stuff.
Only one of those I can offer an educated opinion to is No2. Emissions will definitely go up. I use to work in the insurance industry and one of my customers owned a small company in Kent that did R&D work for Jag Landrover on their ECU's and other systems like ABS, Stability Control etc etc. I did his business and professional indemnities insurance for him and as you can imagine the limits were pretty big numbers so we spent a lot of time trying to understand what he did and the risks we were covering. He told us that since the 2006 emission based tax system came in engines were tuned primarily for emissions. He said removing that restriction from engine development would allow an immediate increase of 20-25% in power output. He also said it was having a negative impact on fuel economy.
Negative impact on emissions makes little difference at the moment but might in the future if rules around MOT's and or TAX change?!?!
So what we need is some method of fooling people that our bike is producing low emissions when tested but revert back to full power when back on the road and sod the emissions. Now let me think.................



I got it done. I don't really care what the numbers say or how Geoff does what he does, but when I left I rode off on a much smoother, livelier bike. Works for me and that's all that really counts.
Why is it that every time someone mentions Hilltop all the Trolls come out? If you don't like it, don't do it, but there's no need to slag it off.
I deal with loads of semiconductor manufacturers and suppliers, not one refuses to send me an email in response to technical queries when I ask for detailed specifications and advice, they are more than happy to tell me about their products and services.
You can't beat a good Hilltop thread
I would imagine that information is given under a supplier contract which includes an NDA (non-disclosure arrangement). This will have been produced by your procurement division - they are the nice people who sit a long way away from you at work, although that may not be helpful as I would imagine most people try to sit as far away from you as possible at your work
Should you then plaster any commercially sensitive information over the internet you would probably need to change your name on here to ex-Engineer!
If you were genuinely interested in the details of how Geoff gets his results, as opposed to simply arguing the toss about every point from behind your keyboard, you would simply do what E.Buygum (who is a software engineer) did and give Geoff a call and have his questions answered to his satisfaction.
Geoff has said several times he's happy to talk to people who want more information, or you can go over and see what he does, or you can even have the work done and if you don't like it you get your money back!
So go on Engineer, pick up the phone and give Geoff a call! What have you got to lose?
You can't beat a good Hilltop thread
